Difference between reading and listening to a book

7.58  ·  1,488 ratings  ·  247 reviews
Posted on by
difference between reading and listening to a book

Are Audiobooks As Good For You As Reading? Here’s What Experts Say | Time

Audiobook sales have doubled in the last five years while print and e-book sales are flat. These trends might lead us to fear that audiobooks will do to reading what keyboarding has done to handwriting — rendered it a skill that seems quaint and whose value is open to debate. But examining how we read and how we listen shows that each is best suited to different purposes, and neither is superior. In fact, they overlap considerably. Consider why audiobooks are a good workaround for people with dyslexia: They allow listeners to get the meaning while skirting the work of decoding, that is, the translation of print on the page to words in the mind. Writing is less than 6, years old, insufficient time for the evolution of specialized mental processes devoted to reading.
File Name: difference between reading and listening to a book.zip
Size: 56446 Kb
Published 07.01.2019


Are Audiobooks As Good For You As Reading? Here’s What Experts Say

If you have something to say to me about audiobooks, say it to my face. Kind of like you just did, but more animated. In fact, listening to an audiobook is better. How many times have you seen a squirrel nibble on a discarded slice of pizza from the pointy end, like a fluffy little human, while you had your eyes focussed on some stupid page? The only thing you can look at while reading is words. Which I can also look at while listening to an audiobook, by the way. Book clubs.

Audiobooks vs Reading: Comprehension

As is required of all women in their 30s, I am in a book club. That , the rest of the group decided together, is definitely cheating. Never mind that no one could exactly articulate how or why it was cheating; it just felt like it was, and others would agree. She never substituted the audiobook for the print version again or, if she did, she never again admitted it. He is very tired of this question, and so, recently, he wrote a blog post addressing it. So, according to that understanding of the question: No, audiobooks are not cheating.

In , near the beginning of the MP3 audio book craze, the New York Times charmingly detailed the listening habits of New York authors, who dabbled in Dostoyevsky as they strolled around with their dachshunds:. Thanks in part to the ubiquity of iPods other gadgets, audio books remain popular despite turmoil in the publishing industry - experiencing a modest growth in sales in past years. But do all the myriad benefits that books provide - intellectual enrichment, emotional fulfillment, entertainment - really transmit just as well through sound? Opinions among book lovers differ as to what it means to read "Ulysses" through ear buds on the drive to work. I don't think I retain as much that way, plus I get distracted with other things. Pretty much, but it depends on the type of book. However, even research that predates CDs suggests that reading and listening are strikingly similar cognitive processes.

4 thoughts on “To Your Brain, Audiobooks Are Not ‘Cheating’ -- Science of Us

  1. There was a time when you went to the library or a bookstore, picked up whatever book interested you, then disappeared into the fantasy world of your choosing.

  2. Sep 6, “We found no significant differences in comprehension between reading, listening, or reading and listening simultaneously,” Rogowsky says.

Leave a Reply